James Plank Discussion Paper Assignment Help

James Plank Discussion Paper Assignment Help

 

watch this video to learn about how we can complete your assignments 

Description

Respond by Day 5 to two colleagues in the following way:

  • In what ways do you agree or disagree that the validity issues in the scenarios of causal claim selected by your colleagues are the most important? Provide a rationale, including examples or references.

$5 Post

  1. Field Experiment: Minimum wage legislation will lead to higher unemployment
  2. Cross Sectional Study: Capital punishment deters crime

Internal validity is critical to the defensibility of impact evaluations as it is defined as the accuracy of the causal claim (Langbein, 2012). The most important validity issue within a causal claim is controlling for other systematic variables, represented as Zk. Knowing the value of this variable is imperative for the evaluation to have validity. For example, “minimum wage legislation will lead to higher unemployment” is a causal claim that has other systematic variables such as region, current economic conditions, or whether a country is currently at war or in peace times. Another causal claim example is “capital punishment deters crime” where the systematic variables could be urban/rural populations, current unemployment rates, or other economic conditions. In other words, it is important to know and measure other systematic variables (Zk) in an evaluation that could have an impact on the outcome (Y).

I believe that controlling for other systematic variables within an evaluation is the most important issue as it significantly impacts internal validity. If one were to conduct an evaluation regarding legislation that increased the minimum wage to determine if it had increased unemployment, one must look at the region as a variable, among other variables. The impact of the legislation will have different effects across regions, making it important to highlight where the results were taken. This variable, represented as Zk, will ensure that the variable maintains its internal validity when held up to scrutiny.

References

Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

Do you have a similar assignment and would want someone to complete it for you? Click on
the ORDER NOW option to get instant services at LindasHelp.com. We assure you of a well
written and plagiarism free papers delivered within your specified deadline.

AD:

HQD CUVIE PLUS | FUME EXTRA  HQD CUVIE AIR  |  FUME INFINITY  FUME ULTRA  MORE XXL VAPE  HQD VAPE  CUVIE PLUS 

James Plank Discussion Paper Assignment Help

Description

Respond by Day 5 to two colleagues in the following way:

  • In what ways do you agree or disagree that the validity issues in the scenarios of causal claim selected by your colleagues are the most important? Provide a rationale, including examples or references.

$5 Post

  1. Field Experiment: Minimum wage legislation will lead to higher unemployment
  2. Cross Sectional Study: Capital punishment deters crime

Internal validity is critical to the defensibility of impact evaluations as it is defined as the accuracy of the causal claim (Langbein, 2012). The most important validity issue within a causal claim is controlling for other systematic variables, represented as Zk. Knowing the value of this variable is imperative for the evaluation to have validity. For example, “minimum wage legislation will lead to higher unemployment” is a causal claim that has other systematic variables such as region, current economic conditions, or whether a country is currently at war or in peace times. Another causal claim example is “capital punishment deters crime” where the systematic variables could be urban/rural populations, current unemployment rates, or other economic conditions. In other words, it is important to know and measure other systematic variables (Zk) in an evaluation that could have an impact on the outcome (Y).

I believe that controlling for other systematic variables within an evaluation is the most important issue as it significantly impacts internal validity. If one were to conduct an evaluation regarding legislation that increased the minimum wage to determine if it had increased unemployment, one must look at the region as a variable, among other variables. The impact of the legislation will have different effects across regions, making it important to highlight where the results were taken. This variable, represented as Zk, will ensure that the variable maintains its internal validity when held up to scrutiny.

References

Langbein, L. (2012). Public program evaluation: A statistical guide (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

Do you have a similar assignment and would want someone to complete it for you? Click on
the ORDER NOW option to get instant services at LindasHelp.com. We assure you of a well
written and plagiarism free papers delivered within your specified deadline.

AD:

HQD CUVIE PLUS | FUME EXTRA  HQD CUVIE AIR  |  FUME INFINITY  FUME ULTRA  MORE XXL VAPE  HQD VAPE  CUVIE PLUS